A short biodegradable helical spiral ureteric stent provides better antireflux and drainage properties than a double-J stent.

OBJECTIVE: The use of ureteric stents is a standard treatment for the relief of ureter blockages for benign or malignant reasons. The most common stent design in clinical use is a double-J stent with coiled ends to avoid stent displacement. However, there are a number of complications associated with stent use. A double-J stent design bypasses the ureterovesical junction, enables bladder pressure reflection to the renal pelvis and causes vesicoureteral reflux (VUR). This may result in scarring and renal failure. MATERIAL AND METHODS: An animal model was used to investigate whether VUR can be avoided in stented ureters using a short biodegradable partial helical spiral stent design that leaves the ureterovesical junction intact. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eight female pigs were used. Ureters on the left side were stented using a short helical spiral SR-PLGA stent (group A) and ureters on the right side using double-J stents (group B). Simulated voiding cystoureterography and standard intravenous urography examinations were performed on all eight animals at 4 weeks and on the remaining four animals at 8 weeks. RESULTS: An SR-PLGA single coiled partial stent demonstrated superior drainage properties to a double-J stent at 4 weeks (p = 0.020). A marked but not statistically significant difference in favour of a SR-PLGA stent was also observed at 8 weeks (p = 0.102). A statistically significant difference was observed in VCUG findings in favour of group A at immediate postoperative control as well as in the 4 and 8 week follow-up studies (p = 0.011, p = 0.010, p = 0.046, respectively). CONCLUSION: A self-expandable, SR-PLGA partial ureteric stent presented with superior drainage and antireflux properties compared to a double-J stent. The reflux commonly related to double-J stent use can be minimized by using a partial ureteric stent design.

Drainage and antireflux characteristics of a biodegradable self-reinforced, self-expanding X-ray-positive poly-L,D-lactide spiral partial ureteral stent: an experimental study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the drainage and antireflux characteristics of a new self-expandable self-reinforced poly-L,D-lactide partial ureteral stent (SR-PLA 96) in an experimental model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twelve dogs were used as experimental animals. A low-midline laparotomy and cystotomy were performed on all animals. In group A (six animals), 50-mm long SR-PLA 96 ureteral stents with a double-helical spiral design were inserted into both ureters, leaving the lower ends 2 cm above the ureterovesical junction. In group B (six animals), both ureters were stented with traditional pigtail stents (C-Flex) Double-J; Cook Urological), which were removed 8 weeks after surgery. Renal function and ureteral patency were evaluated by dynamic kidney imaging and urography examinations at 6 and 12 weeks postoperatively. The degrees of vesicoureteral reflux at two levels of the ureters and at the level of the renal pelvis were evaluated by nuclear voiding cystograms at 6 weeks. RESULTS: The partial SR-PLA 96 stent design showed more favorable antireflux properties that the Double-J stent design. The degree of vesicoureteral reflux, reflected in an increase of nuclear enhancement at 6 weeks, was lower in the distal (7.9% +/- 14.7% v 63.2% +/- 17.3%; P < 0.05) and middle (6.1% +/- 8.1% v. 45.5% +/- 19.5%; P = 0.15) levels of the ureters as well as at the level of the renal pelvis (-3.4% +/- 3.6% v 6.2% +/- 3.9%; P = 0.65) than in the Double-J-stented ureters. No significant differences in renal function or ureteral patency were observed at 12 weeks after the Double-J stents had been removed and the SR-PLA 96 stents had fragmented. CONCLUSION: A self-expandable, self-reinforced SR-PLA 96 partial ureteral stent showed more favorable antireflux properties than a Double-J stent.